From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 07:29:39 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pretend-sha1: grave bugfix.
Message-ID: <7v8xeya7bw.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070216050943.GD28894@spearce.org>

"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org> writes:

> Aren't we using this for git-blame --contents?  How'd that ever
> work for a non-empty file?

My guess is that git-blame's blob handling has its own built-in
cache to avoid read_sha1_file(), and that single "initial" blob
is primed by hand, so read_sha1_file() is usually not called for
that object name.