Re: [PATCH] merge-recursive: introduce merge_options
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 28, 2008, 04:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v8wuhiw05.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <1219674357-31000-1-git-send-email-vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> writes:
Show 18 quoted lines
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:06:06PM -0700, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> writes: >> >> > 1) This applies on top of 1c868d4 (merge-recursive.c: Add more >> > generic merge_recursive_generic()). I can rebase this (along with >> > 1c868d4 and 1c868d4^) on top of current master, if this is a problem. >> >> It probably is cleaner to treat this as a fresh topic from scratch on >> top of 'master', as we do not have anything outstanding in 'next' >> around this area. > > I'm now confused about what should I do: > > 1) Nothing. (That's what I did for now.) > > 2) Rebase against master and resend. > > 3) Rebase, squash and resend.
What I meant was that the final state after applying this patch may make what "git log master..1c868d4" currently shows (there are two patches if I recall correctly) an incomplete failed experiment, in which case squashing and possibly refactoring (if the result of squashing is too messy) would make the history easier to review.
But I looked at the series again after rebasing them myself.
If you want to clean-it-up, you could replace them by sending in updates to refactor them. I think they are still ugly, even though the end result is tolerable ;-)