Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2008, #05; Tue, 19)
- From
Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
- Date
- Aug 19, 2008, 12:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080819125429.GD17582@genesis.frugalware.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vpro5cr2x.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 02:05:42AM -0700, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> [On Hold] > (...) > * mv/merge-recursive (Tue Aug 12 22:14:00 2008 +0200) 3 commits > - Make builtin-revert.c use merge_recursive_generic() > - merge-recursive.c: Add more generic merge_recursive_generic() > - Split out merge_recursive() to merge-recursive.c > > I do not think builtlin-revert should use "recursive", but these patches > give a good starting point to separate the bulk of the "rename-aware > three-way merge" into library form.
I wanted to send a patch that makes builtin-merge use the new merge_recursive_setup(), but then I was not able to decide to use merge_recursive_generic() or not.
What is your preference here? I just want to avoid a "this could be merged, but it uses merge_recursive(), not merge_recursive_generic()" or the opposite of this. :)
Thanks.