Re: [PATCH] add -p: import Term::ReadKey with 'require'

> On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 12:21:13AM +0100, Thomas Rast wrote:
>
>> > (note that you could also skip the import and just call
>> > Term::ReadKey::ReadKey by its full name).
>> 
>> I tried that but couldn't get either Term::ReadKey::ReadKey or
>> Term::ReadKey->ReadKey to work.  In retrospect, I suppose it requires
>> parentheses too.
>
> Right, you would still need the parentheses. But note that the second
> syntax (with the "->") would always be wrong. The "::" syntax just says
> "find this name not in the current namespace, but in this absolute
> namespace I am giving you". But "X->Y" is actually a syntactic shorthand
> for "look up X::Y (or Z::Y, where Z is the blessed package of X), and
> then call X::Y(X, @_)".
>
> Which makes sense for object-oriented stuff. You get the object or the
> classname as the first parameter to a method. But for a regular package
> function, you would be calling
>
>   Term::ReadKey::ReadKey('Term::ReadKey', 0)
>
> which of course makes no sense.
>
> But I think doing the import makes more sense (and is how Term::ReadKey
> is intended to be used), so the patch you posted is best.