Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2012, #02; Fri, 4)
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 10, 2012, 16:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v8vh0nfu3.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20120510151328.GA20639@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> Ah, OK. I thought the progression you used was topic->pu->next->maint. > Did that used to be the case, or am I just crazy?
I may have done that in the past, but I think the current arrangement makes more sense in order to keep 'maint' really stale^Wstable. The process improvement happens ;-).