From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 16:47:16 GMT
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2012, #02; Fri, 4)
Message-ID: <7v8vh0nfu3.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120510151328.GA20639@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> Ah, OK. I thought the progression you used was topic->pu->next->maint.
> Did that used to be the case, or am I just crazy?

I may have done that in the past, but I think the current arrangement
makes more sense in order to keep 'maint' really stale^Wstable.  The
process improvement happens ;-).