Re: [RFC 0/3] Reflogs for deleted refs: fix breakage and suggest namespace change
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 20, 2012, 01:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v7gsunzpk.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vobm6o1cu.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Either Jeff's "refname $name's log goes to logs/graveyard/$name~" or > Michael's "append ~d to each directory component, append ~f to the > leaf component" that are already proposed will keep "one file per > name" property to allow us to open once and efficiently read the > file through. Why would we want to see an inferiour alternative > added to the discussion?
Note that there may be some "other" advantage I am not seeing in the "directory with timestamp in its name"; if it is a big enough advantage over what have already been proposed, then that would be a valid reason why we may want to see it as an alternative (and at that point, it is no longer inferior). That is the reason why I asked "How would that help us in what way?"