Re: [PATCH] merge-recursive: Only print relevant rename messages
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Nov 7, 2005, 23:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v64r4qai6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20051107231944.GA11327@c165.ib.student.liu.se>
Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> @@ -178,7 +181,7 @@ def mergeFile(oPath, oSha, oMode, aPath, > sha = bSha > else: > if aSha != oSha and bSha != oSha: > - merge = True > + merge = MERGE_TRIVIAL
The rest looks good to me, but are you sure about this part? I have a feeling that the above "and" should be "or", meaning, we check to see if there is _any_ change, and default to TRIVIAL, but later we would find that we need a real merge and then promote it to MERGE_3WAY.