Re: [PATCH] git-svnimport.perl: fix for 'arg list too long...'
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Feb 1, 2006, 20:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v64nybz9m.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060201155331.GE18078@sashak.voltaire.com>
Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak@voltaire.com> writes:
> This fixes 'arg list too long..' problem with git-ls-files.
I wonder if feeding the list into a pipe to 'update-index --stdin' would be an option.
BTW, please do not do this:
Mail-Followup-To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>,
Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de>, git@vger.kernel.orgIt is simply rude.
* I and/or Smurf may be uninterested in hearing the whole discussion thread started by you. We might well be, but that is not something you shoudl decide upfront in your message.
* When a recipient of your message tries to "[R]eply" to *you*, that Mail-Followup-To: would cause the MUA to address that message to me and/or smurf by default, not to you. I had to edit the resulting To: header by hand to address this response to you. Why force extra work on others?
I know why you did it --- you subscribe to git list and otherwise you would get two copies.
That is _not_ a good excuse. That is how mailing lists work; either you filter the duplicates on your end, or you learn to live with it. Please don't force extra work on others.
I think the only header mucking of this kind that is acceptable is to remove yourself from CC: line when the mailing list you subscribe to is already on the CC: line.