Show 15 quoted lines
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>>
>> > Further, I am quite sure that the same mistake will happen again, until we
>> > change the function to get the name length, not the number of bytes to
>> > allocate.
>>
>> I agree. But leaving the majority of cases using the old convention is
>> just confusing.
>
> Yeah, sorry, that patch was only half-cooked.
>
> If people agree with me, I'll redo the patch (fixing all calling sites,
> too).