Show 22 quoted lines
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 11:47:56PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Which would make the rewritten patch like this...
>
> Looks like our patches just crossed paths. Yours looks OK, but we
> should add something to the 'configuration' section, and...
>
>> diff --git a/wt-status.h b/wt-status.h
>> index 225fb4d..63d50f2 100644
>> --- a/wt-status.h
>> +++ b/wt-status.h
>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ struct wt_status {
>>
>> int git_status_config(const char *var, const char *value);
>> int wt_status_use_color;
>> +int wt_status_relative_paths;
>> void wt_status_prepare(struct wt_status *s);
>> void wt_status_print(struct wt_status *s);
>
> Shouldn't both of these ints be marked "extern"? I'm surprised it worked
> at all (or perhaps the part of my brain that stores C linkage issues is
> rotting?).