[PATCH] tree_entry_interesting(): with no pathspecs, everything will match
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 31, 2011, 20:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v62t46cyz.fsf_-_@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTik_7FUuocoXa7Rk5DWSR4ie7FBfYNa0MSQzwnsZ@mail.gmail.com>
Hence the function should return "2" in such a case as advertised.
Note that finding a directory that busts the depth limit does not mean non directories at the same level would also bust the limit (they don't), so we still need to return 1, not 2 in the within_depth() codepath.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> ---
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
>> When depth check is in effect, the result depends on the mode of the >> entry, so we cannot short-circuit by returning 2, but at least we should >> do so when (max_depth == -1), no? > > Yes, should be 2.
Thanks. I'll queue this.
tree-walk.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tree-walk.c b/tree-walk.c index 9b43ad5..ece8cc0 100644 --- a/tree-walk.c +++ b/tree-walk.c @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ int tree_entry_interesting(const struct name_entry *entry, if (!ps->nr) { if (!ps->recursive || ps->max_depth == -1) - return 1; + return 2; return !!within_depth(base->buf + base_offset, baselen, !!S_ISDIR(entry->mode), ps->max_depth);
-- 1.7.4.261.g705f2