Re: [ANNOUNCE] git/gitweb.git repository

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Sep 1, 2007, 01:44 UTC
Message-ID: <7v4pifw45n.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070901013159.GP1219@pasky.or.cz>

Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> writes:

Show 9 quoted lines

> On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 03:25:16AM CEST, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Luben Tuikov wrote:
>> 
>> > So what's the review process now?
>> 
>> Umm.  Pasky set it up, so it's Pasky who decides what goes in and what 
>> not.  What exactly is your problem?
>
>   Junio will pull from it, so he has full right to ask. :-)

Well, I won't blindly pull from it, but honestly when it comes to gitweb I trust Pasky's judgement as much as I trust myself, if not even more. And I think the review process Pasky described is good --- people will see both the patches on the list and code in action at repo.or.cz/.

I am a bit worried about the 'master' being a "StGIT stack", though. Playgrounds to be cherry-picked from (aka 'pu') would make *perfect* sense to be managed that way (and the topics that go only 'pu' of git.git itself are managed the same except that I do not do so using StGIT), but I think we need a stable history for the branch git.git will eventually pull from.