Re: [PATCH] Set up argv0_path correctly, even when argv[0] is just the basename

From

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

Date

Aug 3, 2008, 20:43 UTC

Message-ID

<7v3allvnhm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

In-Reply-To

<20080803202513.GC3482@efreet.light.src>

Jan Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz> writes:

> On UNIX, not only that argv[0] can contain the program without path -- it can
> contain anything the user thinks of.... Maybe since
> it's only needed for resolving a relative exec dir, relative exec dir could
> be supported only on systems that have such method (which is most of them).