Re: git merge --abort
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 21, 2009, 09:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v3ae8rvvd.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <m3ocwwrxtg.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:
> Perhaps this is the case fo "feature that waits for a user", namely > 'git stash --no-reset', which would save a state just in case, perhaps > in a separate area and not refs/stash (ORIG_STASH perhaps?).
Isn't that Nana's "git stash --keep" patch posted a few weeks ago sitting in "pu"?