Re: git merge --abort
- From
John Tapsell <johnflux@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 20, 2009, 08:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <43d8ce650902200042y13caa60dtcc55d8069d90ee4d@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vljs1fqxn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
2009/2/20 Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>:
Show 15 quoted lines
> John Tapsell <johnflux@gmail.com> writes: > >> 2009/2/20 Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>: >> <snip> >>> $ edit ;# unrelated local changes are still here >>> $ git pull ;# or merge or whatever >>> ... oops, large conflict ... >>> ... look and see if it can easily be resolved ... >>> ... otherwise >>> $ git merge --abort >> >> Can I just confirm - at this stage, "git merge --abort" would be a >> "git reset --hard HEAD" ? > > Not at all. Please re-read my previous message that begins with "Not at all".
Doh sorry. Yeah it has to be that long algorithm that you outlined. Can it be done with a series of currently existing commands? Can I persuade someone else to implement it ? :-)
John