Re: RFC: allowing multiple parallel sequencers
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Apr 2, 2013, 18:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v38v8eriz.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20130402174640.GA14473@neilslaptop.think-freely.org>
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> I've recently started looking into the possibility of having git support > multiple in-progress sequencers, and wanted to solicit opinions for how best to > do it.... The thoughts I had were: > > 1) A per branch sequence directory... > 2) Augment the git-stash command...
3) A per branch working tree.
That is how I would do this myself, anyway ;-)