From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 18:06:28 GMT
Subject: Re: RFC: allowing multiple parallel sequencers
Message-ID: <7v38v8eriz.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130402174640.GA14473@neilslaptop.think-freely.org>

Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> writes:

> 	I've recently started looking into the possibility of having git support
> multiple in-progress sequencers, and wanted to solicit opinions for how best to
> do it.... The thoughts I had were:
>
> 1) A per branch sequence directory...
> 2) Augment the git-stash command...

3) A per branch working tree.

That is how I would do this myself, anyway ;-)