Re: [RFH] CE_REMOVE conversion
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 21, 2008, 20:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v1w76ul70.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802210922100.7833@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> It includes your "continue" fix, since that was actually related to the > "remove_index_entry()" addition this needs. It also contains the hash next > pointer initialization.
In the meantime, 'master' will get that single-liner "continue" fix, which may conflict but the resolution is trivial.
> But I'm still looking at this. In particular, I want to add some > assertions to make sure the index state matches the name hash state, but > your lazy patch makes that less convenient.
Please feel free to revert it.