From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:08:18 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFH] CE_REMOVE conversion
Message-ID: <7v1w76ul70.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802210922100.7833@woody.linux-foundation.org>

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:

> It includes your "continue" fix, since that was actually related to the 
> "remove_index_entry()" addition this needs. It also contains the hash next 
> pointer initialization.

In the meantime, 'master' will get that single-liner "continue"
fix, which may conflict but the resolution is trivial.

> But I'm still looking at this. In particular, I want to add some 
> assertions to make sure the index state matches the name hash state, but 
> your lazy patch makes that less convenient.

Please feel free to revert it.