Re: [PATCH] Remove negation from the commit and merge option "--no-verify"
- From
- Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 29, 2021, 13:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7be2fde3-69b2-1da7-bb94-7c181490f626@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <YXrFaJXbuSuwfhQ7@pflmari>
Hi Alex
On 28/10/2021 16:44, Alex Riesen wrote:
Show 172 quoted lines
> From: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
>
> This documents re-enabling of the hooks disabled by an earlier
> "--no-verify" in command-line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Hi Phillip,
>
> Phillip Wood, Thu, Oct 28, 2021 15:57:58 +0200:
>> On 28/10/2021 09:04, Alex Riesen wrote:
>>> From: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> This allows re-enabling of the hooks disabled by an earlier "--no-verify"
>>> in command-line and makes the interface more consistent.
>>
>> Thanks for working on this. Since 0f1930c587 ("parse-options: allow
>> positivation of options starting, with no-", 2012-02-25) merge and commit
>> have accepted "--verify" but it is undocumented. The documentation updates
>> and fix to pull in this patch are very welcome, but I'm not sure we need the
>> other changes. I've left a couple of comments below.
>>
>> [As an aside we should probably improve the documentation in parse-options.h
>> if both Peff and Junio did not know how it handles "--no-foo" but that is
>> outside the scope of this patch]
>
> Interesting feature. It is unfortunate it was so well hidden. You're right, of
> course, and the newly added tests in t7504-commit-msg-hook.sh pass without any
> changes to the "builtin/commit.c".
>
> Removal of double-negation in the code was an improvement to its readability,
> but I like small patches more.
>
> Also, the series has no conflicts with 2.33.0 anymore and the "git pull" can
> be applied independently.
>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/git-commit.txt b/Documentation/git-commit.txt
>>> index a3baea32ae..ba66209274 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/git-commit.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/git-commit.txt
>>> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ SYNOPSIS
>>> 'git commit' [-a | --interactive | --patch] [-s] [-v] [-u<mode>] [--amend]
>>> [--dry-run] [(-c | -C | --fixup | --squash) <commit>]
>>> [-F <file> | -m <msg>] [--reset-author] [--allow-empty]
>>> - [--allow-empty-message] [--no-verify] [-e] [--author=<author>]
>>> + [--allow-empty-message] [--[no-]verify] [-e] [--author=<author>]
>>
>> I think for the synopsis it is fine just to list the most common options.
>> Having --no-verify without the [no-] makes it clear that --verify is the
>> default so is not a commonly used option.
>
> Yep, makes sense.
>
>>> [--date=<date>] [--cleanup=<mode>] [--[no-]status]
>>> [-i | -o] [--pathspec-from-file=<file> [--pathspec-file-nul]]
>>> [-S[<keyid>]] [--] [<pathspec>...]
>>> @@ -174,7 +174,13 @@ The `-m` option is mutually exclusive with `-c`, `-C`, and `-F`.
>>> -n::
>>> --no-verify::
>>> - This option bypasses the pre-commit and commit-msg hooks.
>>> + By default, pre-merge and commit-msg hooks are run. When one of these
>>
>> I think saying "the pre-merge and commit-msg hooks" would be clearer as you
>> do below.
>>
>>> + options is given, these are bypassed.
>>> + See also linkgit:githooks[5].
>>> +
>>> +--verify::
>>> + This option re-enables running of the pre-commit and commit-msg hooks
>>> + after an earlier `-n` or `--no-verify`.
>>> See also linkgit:githooks[5].
>>
>> Some of the existing documentation describes the "--no-foo" option with
>> "--foo" (e.g --[no-]signoff) but in other places we list the two options
>> separately (e.g. --[no-]edit), I'd lean towards combining them as you have
>> done for the merge documentation but I don't feel strongly about it.
>
> How about this instead:
>
> -n::
> --no-verify::
> By default, pre-commit and commit-msg hooks are run. When one of these
> options is given, the hooks will be bypassed.
> See also linkgit:githooks[5].
>
> --verify::
> This option re-enables running of the pre-commit and commit-msg hooks
> after an earlier `-n` or `--no-verify`.
>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/git-merge.txt b/Documentation/git-merge.txt
>>> index 3819fadac1..324ae879d2 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/git-merge.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/git-merge.txt
>>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ SYNOPSIS
>>> --------
>>> [verse]
>>> 'git merge' [-n] [--stat] [--no-commit] [--squash] [--[no-]edit]
>>> - [--no-verify] [-s <strategy>] [-X <strategy-option>] [-S[<keyid>]]
>>> + [--[no-]verify] [-s <strategy>] [-X <strategy-option>] [-S[<keyid>]]
>>
>> Again I'm not sure changing the synopsis makes things clearer.
>
> Removed.
>
>>> [--[no-]allow-unrelated-histories]
>>> [--[no-]rerere-autoupdate] [-m <msg>] [-F <file>] [<commit>...]
>>> 'git merge' (--continue | --abort | --quit)
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/merge-options.txt b/Documentation/merge-options.txt
>>> index 80d4831662..f8016b0f7b 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/merge-options.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/merge-options.txt
>>> @@ -112,8 +112,9 @@ option can be used to override --squash.
>>> +
>>> With --squash, --commit is not allowed, and will fail.
>>> ---no-verify::
>>> - This option bypasses the pre-merge and commit-msg hooks.
>>> +--[no-]verify::
>>> + By default, pre-merge and commit-msg hooks are run. When `--no-verify`
>>
>> I think "the pre-merge ..." would be better here as well.
>
> Like this?
>
> --[no-]verify::
> By default, the pre-merge and commit-msg hooks are run.
> When `--no-verify` is given, these are bypassed.
> See also linkgit:githooks[5].
>
>>> diff --git a/t/t7504-commit-msg-hook.sh b/t/t7504-commit-msg-hook.sh
>>> index 31b9c6a2c1..166ff5fb26 100755
>>> --- a/t/t7504-commit-msg-hook.sh
>>> +++ b/t/t7504-commit-msg-hook.sh
>>> @@ -130,6 +130,14 @@ test_expect_success '--no-verify with failing hook' '
>>> '
>>> +test_expect_success '-n with failing hook' '
>>> +
>>> + echo "more" >> file &&
>>> + git add file &&
>>> + git commit -n -m "more"
>>> +
>>> +'
>>
>> Is this to check that "-n" works like "--no-verify"?
>
> Frankly, it was to check that the separate "-n" option works as I supposed it
> would. I never used parse-options before.
>
>> I think it would be very useful to add another test that checks "--verify"
>> overrides "--no-verify".
>
> Replaced the test with one which has "-n --verify".
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Documentation/git-commit.txt | 7 ++++++-
> Documentation/merge-options.txt | 5 +++--
> t/t7504-commit-msg-hook.sh | 8 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-commit.txt b/Documentation/git-commit.txt
> index a3baea32ae..2268787483 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-commit.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-commit.txt
> @@ -174,9 +174,14 @@ The `-m` option is mutually exclusive with `-c`, `-C`, and `-F`.
>
> -n::
> --no-verify::
> - This option bypasses the pre-commit and commit-msg hooks.
> + By default, pre-commit and commit-msg hooks are run. When one of theseAs I suggested yesterday I think this would be better if it kept the "the" from the original text as you do below for the merge documentation - s/default, /&the /
Show 23 quoted lines
> + options is given, the hooks will be bypassed. > See also linkgit:githooks[5]. > > +--verify:: > + This option re-enables running of the pre-commit and commit-msg hooks > + after an earlier `-n` or `--no-verify`. > + > --allow-empty:: > Usually recording a commit that has the exact same tree as its > sole parent commit is a mistake, and the command prevents you > diff --git a/Documentation/merge-options.txt b/Documentation/merge-options.txt > index 80d4831662..80267008af 100644 > --- a/Documentation/merge-options.txt > +++ b/Documentation/merge-options.txt > @@ -112,8 +112,9 @@ option can be used to override --squash. > + > With --squash, --commit is not allowed, and will fail. > > ---no-verify:: > - This option bypasses the pre-merge and commit-msg hooks. > +--[no-]verify:: > + By default, the pre-merge and commit-msg hooks are run. > + When `--no-verify` is given, these are bypassed. > See also linkgit:githooks[5].
This text looks good. It would be nice to be consistent when documenting "--verify" and "--no-verify" so that documentation for commit and merge both have either a separate entry for each option as you have for commit or a shared entry as you have here for merge. I'd be tempted to use this form in the commit documentation.
Show 16 quoted lines
> -s <strategy>:: > diff --git a/t/t7504-commit-msg-hook.sh b/t/t7504-commit-msg-hook.sh > index 31b9c6a2c1..67fcc19637 100755 > --- a/t/t7504-commit-msg-hook.sh > +++ b/t/t7504-commit-msg-hook.sh > @@ -130,6 +130,14 @@ test_expect_success '--no-verify with failing hook' ' > > ' > > +test_expect_success '-n followed by --verify with failing hook' ' > + > + echo "even more" >> file && > + git add file && > + test_must_fail git commit -n --verify -m "even more" > + > +'
Thanks, having the new test is very helpful.
Best Wishes
Phillip