Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] builtin/reflog: implement subcommand to write new entries
- From
- Kristoffer Haugsbakk <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 29, 2025, 06:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <6cb4522b-43f0-4b0b-9dbf-4f10c8c94487@app.fastmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <6E84D571-CC02-45E6-9E58-DD918B45998E@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025, at 02:25, Ben Knoble wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
>> ... >> Will show one entry since `branch` is the one-level ref `branch`, not >> `refs/heads/branch`. Now it looks like `write` truncated the reflog and >> wrote a new reflog message (if you mistakenly think that `branch` is a >> branch). > > This quirk of update-ref bit me the first few times I used it, too. I > think it’s at least documented there though.
I do that with update-ref more than I care to commit^W admit. But that’s consistent with the command and well-documented.