Re: [PATCH] cache-tree: do not lazy-fetch merge tree
- From
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 4, 2019, 01:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <69f2b069-3e11-4a2e-9b81-bde18c463d8c@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20190903194247.217964-1-jonathantanmy@google.com>
On 9/3/2019 3:42 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> When cherry-picking (for example), new trees may be constructed. During > this process, Git checks whether these trees exist. However, in a > partial clone, this causes a lazy fetch to occur, which is both > unnecessary (because Git has already constructed this tree as part of > the cherry-picking process) and likely to fail (because the remote > probably doesn't have this tree).
If we have constructed the object already, then why do we not see it and avoid fetching it? This must be a slightly strange timing issue with objects being flushed to disk or added to the object cache.
One approach is to find all of these has_object_file() calls that should really be one with OBJECT_INFO_SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT. Another would be to find out why has_object_file() isn't seeing the object we constructed.
> Do not lazy fetch in this situation.
I agree that the patch has this effect.
Show 49 quoted lines
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
> ---
> Another partial clone bug.
>
> This raises the issue that failed fetches are currently fatal - if they
> weren't fatal, this cherry-pick would have worked (except with some
> delay as the fetch is attempted, and with a warning message about the
> fetch failing). My personal inclination right now is to leave things as
> it is (fatal failed fetches), but I'm open to other opinions.
> ---
> cache-tree.c | 2 +-
> t/t0410-partial-clone.sh | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/cache-tree.c b/cache-tree.c
> index c22161f987..9e596893bc 100644
> --- a/cache-tree.c
> +++ b/cache-tree.c
> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static int update_one(struct cache_tree *it,
> if (repair) {
> struct object_id oid;
> hash_object_file(buffer.buf, buffer.len, tree_type, &oid);
> - if (has_object_file(&oid))
> + if (has_object_file_with_flags(&oid, OBJECT_INFO_SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT))
> oidcpy(&it->oid, &oid);
> else
> to_invalidate = 1;
> diff --git a/t/t0410-partial-clone.sh b/t/t0410-partial-clone.sh
> index 6415063980..3e434b6a81 100755
> --- a/t/t0410-partial-clone.sh
> +++ b/t/t0410-partial-clone.sh
> @@ -492,6 +492,20 @@ test_expect_success 'gc stops traversal when a missing but promised object is re
> ! grep "$TREE_HASH" out
> '
>
> +test_expect_success 'do not fetch when checking existence of tree we construct ourselves' '
> + rm -rf repo &&
> + test_create_repo repo &&
> + test_commit -C repo base &&
> + test_commit -C repo side1 &&
> + git -C repo checkout base &&
> + test_commit -C repo side2 &&
> +
> + git -C repo config core.repositoryformatversion 1 &&
> + git -C repo config extensions.partialclone "arbitrary string" &&
> +
> + git -C repo cherry-pick side1
> +'
> +I appreciate this test!
Thanks, -Stolee