Re: [PATCH] Teach 'rebase -i' the command "amend"
- From
Björn Gustavsson <bgustavsson@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 5, 2009, 06:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <6672d0160910042308v7280dcadyff97b977bcfe12c3@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0910042308200.4985@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
2009/10/4 Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>:
> I thought that we had a discussion about this and that the consensus was > that "amend" would be misleading. Maybe you can find that thread in > GMane?
I found this thread from January 2009:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/105738
Having read the thread, I agree that "amend" would be misleading.
There were several suggestions for alternate command names in that thread, for example:
"msg", "msgedit", "message", "reword", "rephrase"
It think that "msgedit" was suggested by several people. ("editmsg" was also suggested, but it is not possible as the abbreviation "e" would become ambiguous.)
Would the patch have a chance to be accepted if I renamed the new command to "msgedit"?
/Björn
-- Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB