Re: [PATCH v3] l10n: localizable upload progress messages
- From
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
- Date
- Jun 22, 2019, 21:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <65cf1cfd-bb5f-dba0-17d6-7fee0ed1f51f@kdbg.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20190622093655.80092-2-dimitriy.ryazantcev@gmail.com>
Am 22.06.19 um 11:36 schrieb Dimitriy Ryazantcev:
Show 59 quoted lines
> Signed-off-by: Dimitriy Ryazantcev <dimitriy.ryazantcev@gmail.com>
> ---
> progress.c | 4 +++-
> strbuf.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/progress.c b/progress.c
> index a2e8cf64a8..61d8cf5d04 100644
> --- a/progress.c
> +++ b/progress.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,9 @@ static void throughput_string(struct strbuf *buf, uint64_t total,
> strbuf_humanise_bytes(buf, total);
> strbuf_addstr(buf, " | ");
> strbuf_humanise_bytes(buf, rate * 1024);
> - strbuf_addstr(buf, "/s");
> + strbuf_addstr(buf, "/");
> + /* TRANSLATORS: IEC 80000-13:2008, subclause 13-12.b: second */
> + strbuf_addstr(buf, _("s"));
> }
>
> void display_throughput(struct progress *progress, uint64_t total)
> diff --git a/strbuf.c b/strbuf.c
> index 0e18b259ce..0a3ebc3749 100644
> --- a/strbuf.c
> +++ b/strbuf.c
> @@ -814,20 +814,28 @@ void strbuf_addstr_urlencode(struct strbuf *sb, const char *s,
> void strbuf_humanise_bytes(struct strbuf *buf, off_t bytes)
> {
> if (bytes > 1 << 30) {
> - strbuf_addf(buf, "%u.%2.2u GiB",
> + strbuf_addf(buf, "%u.%2.2u ",
> (unsigned)(bytes >> 30),
> (unsigned)(bytes & ((1 << 30) - 1)) / 10737419);
> + /* TRANSLATORS: ISO/IEC 80000-13:2008, clause 4: gibi */
> + strbuf_addstr(buf, _("Gi"));
> } else if (bytes > 1 << 20) {
> unsigned x = bytes + 5243; /* for rounding */
> - strbuf_addf(buf, "%u.%2.2u MiB",
> + strbuf_addf(buf, "%u.%2.2u ",
> x >> 20, ((x & ((1 << 20) - 1)) * 100) >> 20);
> + /* TRANSLATORS: ISO/IEC 80000-13:2008, clause 4: mebi */
> + strbuf_addstr(buf, _("Mi"));
> } else if (bytes > 1 << 10) {
> unsigned x = bytes + 5; /* for rounding */
> - strbuf_addf(buf, "%u.%2.2u KiB",
> + strbuf_addf(buf, "%u.%2.2u ",
> x >> 10, ((x & ((1 << 10) - 1)) * 100) >> 10);
> + /* TRANSLATORS: ISO/IEC 80000-13:2008, clause 4: kibi */
> + strbuf_addstr(buf, _("Ki"));
> } else {
> - strbuf_addf(buf, "%u bytes", (unsigned)bytes);
> + strbuf_addf(buf, "%u ", (unsigned)bytes);
> }
> + /* TRANSLATORS: ISO/IEC 80000-13:2008, subclause 13-9.c: byte */
> + strbuf_addstr(buf, _("B"));
> }
>
> void strbuf_add_absolute_path(struct strbuf *sb, const char *path)
> All of the prefixes are in ISO/IEC, i.e., standardized. Why do they have to be translated?
Isn't the way of presentation of magnitudes with a unit also standardized, and should not need to be translated?
-- Hannes