Re: [PATCH 2/2] sha1-name: check for overflow of N in "foo^N" and "foo~N"
- From
René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
- Date
- Sep 15, 2019, 16:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <651e7bdb-c2e8-e607-d78d-5292b3509a8d@web.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <20190915151513.GU11334@genre.crustytoothpaste.net>
Am 15.09.19 um 17:15 schrieb brian m. carlson:
> This approach seems reasonable. I must admit some curiosity as to how > you discovered this issue, though. Did you have a cat assisting you in > typing revisions?
Found it by reading the code, but I'm not sure anymore what I was actually looking for.
Would a fuzzer (or a cat) be able to catch that? The function is happily eating extra digits -- it's not crashing for me.
René