From: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 16:12:13 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sha1-name: check for overflow of N in "foo^N" and "foo~N"
Message-ID: <651e7bdb-c2e8-e607-d78d-5292b3509a8d@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <20190915151513.GU11334@genre.crustytoothpaste.net>

Am 15.09.19 um 17:15 schrieb brian m. carlson:
> This approach seems reasonable.  I must admit some curiosity as to how
> you discovered this issue, though.  Did you have a cat assisting you in
> typing revisions?

Found it by reading the code, but I'm not sure anymore what I was
actually looking for.

Would a fuzzer (or a cat) be able to catch that?  The function is
happily eating extra digits -- it's not crashing for me.

René