Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] test-list-objects: List a subset of object ids

> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 06:48:10PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>>
>>> This is weirdly specific. Can we accomplish the same thing with existing
>>> tools?
>>>
>>> E.g., could:
>>>
>>>    git cat-file --batch-all-objects --batch-check='%(objectname)' |
>>>    shuffle |
>>>    head -n 100
>>>
>>> do the same thing?
>>>
>>> I know that "shuffle" isn't available everywhere, but I'd much rather
>>> see us fill in portability gaps in a general way, rather than
>>> introducing one-shot C code that needs to be maintained (and you
>>> wouldn't _think_ that t/helper programs need much maintenance, but try
>>> perusing "git log t/helper" output; they have to adapt to the same
>>> tree-wide changes as the rest of the code).
>> I was thinking about this a bit more, and came to the conclusion
>> that "sort -R" and "shuf" are wrong tools to use.  We would want to
>> measure with something close to real world workload.  for example,
>> letting
>>
>> 	git rev-list --all --objects
>>
>> produce the listof objects in traversal order (i.e. this is very
>> similar to the order in which "git log -p" needs to access the
>> objects) and chomping at the number of sample objects you need in
>> your test would give you such a list.
> Actually, I'd just as soon see timings for "git log --format=%h" or "git
> log --raw", as opposed to patches 1 and 2.
>
> You won't see a 90% speedup there, but you will see the actual
> improvement that real-world users are going to experience, which is way
> more important, IMHO.
>
> -Peff