Re: [PATCH v2] doc: imply that interactive.singleKey is disabled by default

> On 2024-05-31 19:23, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org> writes:
>>> Just checking, is there something left to be addressed for this 
>>> patch,
>>> before it can be considered to be pulled into the next branch?
>> 
>> Thanks for pinging, as these small things were on the back burner
>> while preparing for updates to maintenance tracks.
>> 
>> Apparently v2 cannot be pulled into the next branch, and I forgot if
>> I saw v3 already.  In general, unless I explicitly say there is no
>> need to resend (sometimes with conditions), I'd expect an updated
>> iteration sent to the list.
> 
> I see, but I'm not really sure is there need for the v3?  Maybe the
> patch description could be tweaked a bit further, but I wasn't under
> impression that you asked for that to be done?  Am I wrong there?