Re: phpdoc diff in git -L is not the correct one

From

René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>

Date

Nov 14, 2020, 23:40 UTC

Message-ID

<5a2d70eb-da75-ff59-8ac1-6ba81e1632da@web.de>

In-Reply-To

<CAN0heSr9=_So-sUhQN86vawBEkJhnrHHsd3OcSYZMZ-idZGFAQ@mail.gmail.com>

Am 14.11.20 um 18:35 schrieb Martin Ågren:

> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 at 16:55, Grégoire PARIS <postmaster@greg0ire.fr> wrote:
>
>>> In the end I think your best option right now is to give explicit line
>>> numbers for <end> and <start>.
>> That is indeed what I currently do, I plugged that to vim's visual
>> selection with
>>
>>    vnoremap <leader>l :<c-u>exe '!git log -L'
>> line("'<").','.line("'>").':'.expand('%')<CR>
>>
>> and it works great!
>
> Great!
>
>> I also suppose the issue is the same for any other language that has
>> documentation above function declarations.
>
> Yeah, you'll see the same thing for C files, e.g., using this in the
> repo of Git itself:
>
>   git log -L :strbuf_swap:strbuf.h
>
> It will follow the lines from the function definition all the way down
> to the next function, but just as you saw in your example, it will not
> match the comment immediately *before* the function. That is, these
> lines will be followed:
>
>   https://github.com/git/git/blob/v2.29.2/strbuf.h#L125-L138

René

---
 line-range.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/line-range.c b/line-range.c
index 9b50583dc0..5d55fa255f 100644
--- a/line-range.c
+++ b/line-range.c
@@ -163,6 +163,13 @@ static const char *find_funcname_matching_regexp(xdemitconf_t *xecfg, const char
 	}
 }

+static int is_empty_line(const char *bol, const char *eol)
+{
+	while (bol < eol && isspace(*bol))
+		bol++;
+	return bol == eol;
+}
+
 static const char *parse_range_funcname(
 	const char *arg, nth_line_fn_t nth_line_cb,
 	void *cb_data, long lines, long anchor, long *begin, long *end,
@@ -233,6 +240,18 @@ static const char *parse_range_funcname(
 		(*end)++;
 	}

+	/*
+	 * Include non-empty, non-funcname lines before the found
+	 * funcname line, as they probably contain related comments.
+	 */
+	while (*begin > 0) {
+		const char *bol = nth_line_cb(cb_data, *begin - 1);
+		const char *eol = nth_line_cb(cb_data, *begin);
+		if (is_empty_line(bol, eol) || match_funcname(xecfg, bol, eol))
+			break;
+		(*begin)--;
+	}
+
 	regfree(&regexp);
 	free(xecfg);
 	free(pattern);
--
2.29.2