RE: [ALTERNATE PATCH] Add a simple option parser.

> On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1 wrote:
> > > 
> > >   Because it's GNU and that it's a heavy dependency to begin with.
> > 
> > So it's more of a political decision then a technical one?
> 
> I'd *strongly* argue against new dependencies unless they buy us 
> something major.
> 
> We've been good at cutting them down, including any required 
> libraries 
> internally. We shouldn't add new ones.
> 
> So we'd have to include GNU getopt sources with the git tree, 
> at which 
> point any advantage would be gone. Might as well include a 
> private and 
> simpler version of our own.