Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] push: add shorthand for --force-with-lease branch creation
- From
Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 26, 2016, 10:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <57973BAD.2020607@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4e07ff23715b53fcd29564be1c74a9f66dd74e1e.1469483499.git.john@keeping.me.uk>
W dniu 2016-07-25 o 23:59, John Keeping pisze:
Show 11 quoted lines
> +test_expect_success 'new branch covered by force-with-lease (explicit)' ' > + setup_srcdst_basic && > + ( > + cd dst && > + git branch branch master && > + git push --force-with-lease=branch: origin branch > + ) && > + git ls-remote dst refs/heads/branch >expect && > + git ls-remote src refs/heads/branch >actual && > + test_cmp expect actual > +'
Do we need to test the negative, that is that if branch is not new it prevents push (e.g. when <branch> is HEAD), or is it covered by other tests?
-- Jakub Narębski