From: Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 10:30:05 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] push: add shorthand for --force-with-lease branch creation
Message-ID: <57973BAD.2020607@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4e07ff23715b53fcd29564be1c74a9f66dd74e1e.1469483499.git.john@keeping.me.uk>

W dniu 2016-07-25 o 23:59, John Keeping pisze:

> +test_expect_success 'new branch covered by force-with-lease (explicit)' '
> +	setup_srcdst_basic &&
> +	(
> +		cd dst &&
> +		git branch branch master &&
> +		git push --force-with-lease=branch: origin branch
> +	) &&
> +	git ls-remote dst refs/heads/branch >expect &&
> +	git ls-remote src refs/heads/branch >actual &&
> +	test_cmp expect actual
> +'

Do we need to test the negative, that is that if branch is not
new it prevents push (e.g. when <branch> is HEAD), or is it
covered by other tests?

-- 
Jakub Narębski