Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] Reference iterators
- From
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
- Date
- Jun 7, 2016, 11:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <5756B6DB.4050301@alum.mit.edu>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq4m99265o.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On 06/04/2016 01:40 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes: > >> On 06/03/2016 11:33 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> [...] >>> Ah, that reminds me. What's the doneness of the dependent topic? >> [...] > > What I meant was the doneness of mh/split-under-lock actually.
I don't know of any open issues or unaddressed feedback in split-under-lock. I've gone over the code many times myself and am pretty confident about it.
I just reviewed the series again, and one thing that I wasn't so happy about was that it makes many changes to the ref transaction error-handling code, but that code is not very well tested (and the content of the error messages is not really tested at all). So I just submitted another patch series to add more tests in this area [1]. Those tests turned up a couple of cosmetic problems but nothing serious.
So as far as I know, this series is ready to go. But it is a big and rather intricate change to an important area of the code, so I hope it can get merged early in the next release cycle to get wider testing.
Michael
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/296626