Re: [PATCH] t5516-fetch-push: Correct misspelled pushInsteadOf
- From
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- Date
- Mar 4, 2015, 10:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <54F6DA06.7000602@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.2.10.1503040439100.60859@buzzword-bingo.mit.edu>
Anders Kaseorg venit, vidit, dixit 04.03.2015 10:43:
Show 23 quoted lines
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, Michael J Gruber wrote: >> If there is no "pushurl": >> "url" will be used as the "URL for fetch" and as the "URL for push". >> if we are pushing and there is "pushinsteadof" for (part of) "url" >> subsitute that within "url" >> else if there is "insteadof" for (part of) "url" >> substitute that within "url" >> >> If there is a "pushurl": >> "url" will be used as the "URL for fetch" and "pushurl" as the "URL for push". >> if we are pushing and there is "insteadof" for (part of) "pushurl" >> substitute that within "pushurl" >> else if we are fetching and there is "insteadof" for (part of) "url" >> substiute that within "url" > > Speaking of that, I recently had to reimplement most of this logic for the > openstack git-review tool (https://review.openstack.org/160152), which is > why I was staring too closely at t5516 in the first place. It would be > nice to have a ‘git ls-remote --get-push-url’ analogous to the existing > ‘git ls-remote --get-url’. > > Anders >
And vice-versa, it would be nice if "git remote" explained where the resulting URLs come from. I vaguely remember looking into this, but I don't think it was simple.
ls-remote and remote don't share code, which is a pitty. GSOC...
Michael