Re: recent cygwin breakage
- From
Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
- Date
- Nov 23, 2014, 23:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <54726884.5070902@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqr3wtyed6.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On 23/11/14 18:13, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 24 quoted lines
> Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> writes: > >> Just a quick heads-up on a recent cygwin breakage. >> >> I updated my (64-bit) cygwin installation yesterday and (along >> with many other packages) I noticed a new version of gcc (and >> presumably libc) was installed (gcc v4.8.3-5 x86-64). >> ... >> However, I haven't run any tests yet. Also, I would need to check >> this out on 32-bit cygwin (I haven't booted that laptop into Win XP >> for quite some time!). >> >> Hmm, I don't really know if this is an unintended side-effect of a >> recent change to cygwin (or a bug), but I couldn't see any mention >> of this on the cygwin mailing list. (I don't intend to report this >> to that mailing list; I don't want to subscribe to (yet another) >> busy list). :( > > Thanks. > > I wonder if it is safe to unconditionally drop XOPEN_SOURCE; would > it cause problems for older Cygwin to those who have not updated to > the recent one yet? The proposed change looks trivially correct > otherwise.
I honestly don't know. I have never attempted to rollback an update to cygwin. (I guess it is possible, but I really don't know how ...)
However, ...
ATB, Ramsay Jones