Re: [PATCH 2/2] config: clear the executable bits (if any) on $GIT_DIR/config

> Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes:
> 
>> On 11/16/2014 07:49 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> ...
>>> So I would suggest not to spend any cycle or any code complexity to
>>> "repair" existing repositories.  Having that bit on does not hurt
>>> anybody.  Those who found it curious can flip that bit off and then
>>> Git with "preserve existing permissions" fix will keep that bit off
>>> from then on.
>>
>> I disagree. The point of "preserve existing permissions" was to allow
>> people to make their config files more readable/writable than the
>> default,...
> 
> s/more/less/, I think, was the original motivation. Having to limit
> more tightly than usual was what made the "config" unusual among
> files under $GIT_DIR.  If it were to loosen, Eric's change should
> not have been done in the first place. The sharedRepository setting
> to defeat the default umask is there for that kind of thing.

>> That being said, I still believe that executable config files are not a
>> significant risk ...
> 
> It is merely an annoyance, to the same degree of annoyance we find
> when we see all files appear executable on a FAT floppy mounted on
> Linux ;-)  I do not think it is a risk at all, and I do not see a
> point in going into people's repository and actively "fixing" it.
> People who notice can fix, and people who do not care do not care
> and are not harmed.