Re: Question about "git commit -a"

From: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Date: Oct 4, 2007, 15:58 UTC
Message-ID: <545CB3B2-96B3-4853-9397-B42F4F268A15@wincent.com>
In-Reply-To: <4d8e3fd30710040838t48bb590erbd90a8c4a1c6e932@mail.gmail.com>

El 4/10/2007, a las 17:38, Paolo Ciarrocchi escribió:

Show 7 quoted lines

> Hi all,
> I was just wondering why git commit doesn't default to "-a" (yes, it's
> another question that came up during a chat with a mercurial user) and
> I didn't find an answer to that.
>
> It's not a big deal but I strongly suspect that the large majority of
> the git users never user git commit without the option "-a".

<http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitFaq>

Specifically:

<http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/ GitFaq#head-3aa45c7d75d40068e07231a5bf8a1a0db9a8b717>

> Am I wrong?

About it being a majority, yes, I suspect so.

Cheers, Wincent