Re: Question about "git commit -a"

> Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> writes:
> 
>> Yes, but it's so enormously powerful once you get a grip on it that I can't
>> for the life of me imagine an scm system without it. You just can't do
>> "scm commit --interactive" without it in a sane way,
> 
> darcs|hg record do a very similar job. The real difference between
> darcs and others here is not "scm commit --interactive", but the fact
> that you can split the work among multiple commands, the index
> maintains a persistant state.
> 
>> or check which merge- conflicts you've already resolved,
> 
> At least bzr and baz have this kind of conflict management. It's just
> a separate file, containing the list of unresolved conflicts.
>