Re: [PATCH 2/2] pretty: add %D format specifier
- From
Harry Jeffery <harry@exec64.co.uk>
- Date
- Sep 11, 2014, 17:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <5411DB50.8080602@exec64.co.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq61guf641.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On 11/09/14 17:56, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Because patch 1/2 alone does not make much sense without 2/2, it > probably would have been better to do these as a single patch.
Would you like me to resubmit it as a single patch, or are you applying them as is?
> And of course a few additional tests to t4205 would not hurt ;-)
Sure. Should the tests be in the same patch, or a subsequent one?