From: Harry Jeffery Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 17:26:40 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pretty: add %D format specifier Message-ID: <5411DB50.8080602@exec64.co.uk> In-Reply-To: On 11/09/14 17:56, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Because patch 1/2 alone does not make much sense without 2/2, it > probably would have been better to do these as a single patch. Would you like me to resubmit it as a single patch, or are you applying them as is? > And of course a few additional tests to t4205 would not hurt ;-) Sure. Should the tests be in the same patch, or a subsequent one?