Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] completion: drop "stash save" completion altogether
- From
Ben Knoble <ben.knoble@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 23, 2026, 18:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <53FFC1C4-1569-4A9D-A1B7-B60A1BF53DF2@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqpkx08hyk.fsf@gitster.g>
Show 20 quoted lines
> Le 23 oct. 2026 à 13:06, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> a écrit : > > "D. Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble@gmail.com> writes: > >> It's been deprecated since fd2ebf14db (stash: mark "git stash save" >> deprecated in the man page, 2017-10-22) and the previous commit removed >> further documentation suggesting to use it. >> >> Since we recommend push instead, stop completing for "save" and remove a >> special case in completion code. It still appears for "git stash <tab>" >> when GIT_COMPLETION_SHOW_ALL=1, and when typed explicitly we still >> complete options for >> >> git stash save --<tab> >> >> which is helpful for folks with finger-memory for save. > > Well, if we can replace the command line to "git stash push --" on > the first <tab> and then start completing for "stash push" with the > second <tab>, it would be superb.
We probably can (I know Zsh is capable), but that means more complex special-casing ;) I’d rather get rid of this case and leave that nicety for someone who’s motivated to get consensus for it, which I am not.
Show 24 quoted lines
> >> diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash >> index 697fef5462..9cd9c7cadb 100644 >> --- a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash >> +++ b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash >> @@ -3558,16 +3558,13 @@ _git_stash () >> __git_resolve_builtins stash >> >> subcommands="$___git_resolved_builtins" >> - subcommand="$(__git_find_on_cmdline "$subcommands save")" >> + subcommand="$(__git_find_on_cmdline "$subcommands")" >> >> if [ -z "$subcommand" ]; then >> case "$((cword - __git_cmd_idx)),$cur" in >> *,--*) >> __gitcomp_builtin stash_push >> ;; >> - 1,sa*) >> - __gitcomp "save" >> - ;; > > Nice to see this go. This would have been maintenance nightmare if > left forever as we will have to remember updating it when "sa" no > longer becomes a unique prefix.