Re: [PATCH 3/3] verify-commit: scriptable commit signature verification

> Jeff King venit, vidit, dixit 16.06.2014 22:39:
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 01:34:20PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>>>> Your middle example above did make me think of one other thing, though.
>>>> As you noted, we actually have _three_ signature types:
>>>>
>>>>   1. signed tags
>>>>
>>>>   2. signed commits
>>>>
>>>>   3. merges with embedded mergetag headers
>>>>
>>>> We already have a tool for (1). Michael is adding a tool for (2). How
>>>> would one check (3) in a similar way?
>>>
>>> Hmph, somehow I misread the patch that it was for both 2 & 3 X-<.
>>
>> I was just assuming it handles only (2) without checking further, so I
>> may be wrong. But I do not think it makes sense to conflate (2) and (3).
>> A merge commit may have both, and they are separate signatures.
>>
>> For that matter, is there a way to expose (3) currently, besides via
>> --show-signature? It does not trigger "%GG" and friends (nor should it).
>> It may make sense to add extra format specifiers for mergetag
>> signatures. Though I do not use them myself, so I am not clear on what
>> the use case is besides a manual, human verification of a particular
>> merge.
> 
> I'm afraid I'm on a weekly git schedule at best, sorry. Just trying to
> catch up on this:
> 
> Admittedly, I simply don't know about "3.". I know only 1. and 2. (and
> don't remember why they are implemented differently).
> 
> Are they documented/decribed somewhere?
> 
> Meanwhile, I'm rebasing on top of the %G related patches by Junio and
> Jeff and hope to send out a v4 later today.
> 
> Michael