git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Pull is Evil

From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date
May 2, 2014, 20:34 UTC
Message-ID
<5364015a94900_135215292ec28@nysa.notmuch>
In-Reply-To
<20140502194637.GL28634@odin.tremily.us>
W. Trevor King wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 02:13:25PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > It would matter almost exactly zero.
> 
> Some folks have explicit merge policies, and deciding how much that
> matters is probably best left up to the projects themselves and not
> decided in Git code.

Let's make some fake numbers to see around how much this would matter. The amount of people that are not used to Git could be around 60%.

Of these, the amount that would be doing integration is probably 30%, as those tasks would be relegated to more advanced users. A project that lets non-advanced users to integration probably wouldn't care if the merges are fast-forward or not, but let's say 10% of them do. That makes 3%.

On the other hand, user might do merges when trying to bring their local repositories up-to-date, let's say 100% of them do. Of those, the ones in a project that doesn't want fast-forward merges is probably 10%. That makes 10%. However, such projects wouldn't want them merging 'origin/master' to 'master', but 'topic' to 'master', so they shouldn't be using `git pull` anyway, but for the sake of argument let's say that they do.

That would make around 8%, and 6% of those wouldn't be using `git pull` anyway.

So no, for all intents and purposes it doesn't matter. I would rather concentrate on the issue more than 90% of the users face.

Show 8 quoted lines
> > And just as they can do pull.promot = true, they can do pull.mode =
> > fetch-only.
> 
> Why would you run a fetch-only pull instead of running 'git fetch'?  I
> think it would make more sense to have 'pull.mode = none' with which
> 'git pull …' turns into a no-op suggesting an explicit
> fetch/{merge|rebase}.  Having something like that available would
> help with the training issue that pull.prompt was addressing.
I fail to see how training them to do this:
  % git config --global pull.mode none
  % git pull
  % git fetch
  % git merge --no-ff
Is preferable than training them to do:
  % git pull --no-ff
-- 
Felipe Contreras
Previous: W. Trevor KingNext: W. Trevor King
Message 33 of 73 in “A failing attempt to use Git in a centralized environment”
  1. Marat RadchenkoApr 28, 2014
  2. Junio C HamanoApr 28, 2014
  3. Pull is Evil (was: Re: A failing attempt to use Git in a centralized environment)Marc Branchaud, Apr 30, 2014
  4. Junio C HamanoApr 30, 2014
  5. Marc BranchaudApr 30, 2014
  6. Jonathan NiederApr 30, 2014
  7. Junio C HamanoApr 30, 2014
  8. Marc BranchaudApr 30, 2014
  9. Andreas KreyMay 2, 2014
  10. David KastrupMay 2, 2014
  11. Andreas KreyMay 3, 2014
  12. David KastrupMay 3, 2014
  13. Felipe ContrerasApr 30, 2014
  14. Marc BranchaudApr 30, 2014
  15. Felipe ContrerasApr 30, 2014
  16. brian m. carlsonMay 1, 2014
  17. Felipe ContrerasMay 1, 2014
  18. Junio C HamanoMay 1, 2014
  19. Felipe ContrerasMay 1, 2014
  20. W. Trevor KingMay 1, 2014
  21. W. Trevor KingMay 1, 2014
  22. Felipe ContrerasMay 1, 2014
  23. W. Trevor KingMay 2, 2014
  24. Felipe ContrerasMay 2, 2014
  25. W. Trevor KingMay 2, 2014
  26. Felipe ContrerasMay 2, 2014
  27. W. Trevor KingMay 2, 2014
  28. Felipe ContrerasMay 2, 2014
  29. W. Trevor KingMay 2, 2014
  30. David KastrupMay 2, 2014
  31. Felipe ContrerasMay 2, 2014
  32. W. Trevor KingMay 2, 2014
  33. Felipe ContrerasMay 2, 2014
  34. W. Trevor KingMay 2, 2014
  35. Felipe ContrerasMay 2, 2014
  36. pull.prompt or other way to slow/disable 'git pull' (was: Pull is Evil)W. Trevor King, May 2, 2014
  37. Felipe ContrerasMay 2, 2014
  38. W. Trevor KingMay 3, 2014
  39. Felipe ContrerasMay 3, 2014
  40. W. Trevor KingMay 4, 2014
  41. Felipe ContrerasMay 4, 2014
  42. Felipe ContrerasMay 1, 2014
  43. Marc BranchaudMay 1, 2014
  44. W. Trevor KingMay 1, 2014
  45. Marc BranchaudMay 1, 2014
  46. W. Trevor KingMay 1, 2014
  47. Marc BranchaudMay 1, 2014
  48. Felipe ContrerasMay 1, 2014
  49. Andreas KreyMay 2, 2014
  50. Felipe ContrerasMay 2, 2014
  51. Junio C HamanoMay 2, 2014
  52. Junio C HamanoMay 2, 2014
  53. brian m. carlsonMay 1, 2014
  54. Felipe ContrerasMay 1, 2014
  55. Felipe ContrerasMay 1, 2014
  56. Marc BranchaudMay 1, 2014
  57. Felipe ContrerasMay 1, 2014
  58. Philip OakleyMay 1, 2014
  59. Philip OakleyMay 1, 2014
  60. Felipe ContrerasMay 1, 2014
  61. W. Trevor KingMay 1, 2014
  62. Felipe ContrerasMay 2, 2014
  63. Felipe ContrerasApr 30, 2014
  64. Matthieu MoyApr 30, 2014
  65. Felipe ContrerasApr 30, 2014
  66. Junio C HamanoApr 30, 2014
  67. Felipe ContrerasApr 30, 2014
  68. Junio C HamanoApr 30, 2014
  69. Felipe ContrerasApr 30, 2014
  70. Stepan KasalApr 30, 2014
  71. Geert BoschApr 30, 2014
  72. John SzakmeisterMay 4, 2014
  73. Max KirillovMay 2, 2014

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.