Re: [PATCH 13/26] update-ref --stdin: Simplify error messages for missing oldvalues
- From
Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com>
- Date
- Mar 10, 2014, 17:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <531DF26E.50806@kitware.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <531DF195.7020304@kitware.com>
On 03/10/2014 01:08 PM, Brad King wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
>> - die("update %s missing [<oldvalue>] NUL", update->ref_name);
>> + die("update %s missing <oldvalue>", update->ref_name);
>
> The reason for the original wording is that the <oldvalue> is indeed
> optional. This can only occur at end-of-input, and it is actually the
> *NUL* that is missing because an empty old value can be specified to
> mean that it it intentionally missing.I see a following patch makes the wording even clearer about unexpected end of input, so ignore my previous review.
-Brad