Re: htonll, ntohll
- From
Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 12, 2013, 14:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <52823ED1.1020306@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <52783518.1030908@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
W dniu 2013-11-05 01:00, Ramsay Jones pisze:
Show 10 quoted lines
> [Note: I have never particularly liked htons, htonl et.al., so adding > these htonll/ntohll functions doesn't thrill me! :-D For example see > this post[1], which echo's my sentiments exactly.] > > HTH > > ATB, > Ramsay Jones > > [1] http://commandcenter.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/byte-order-fallacy.html
Errr... htonl is about host to network order, and not about big- or little-endianness of architecture. The macros are good, its their implementation that might fail [1].
-- Jakub Narębski