Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] rm: delete .gitmodules entry of submodules removed from the work tree

> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:51:51PM +0200, Jens Lehmann wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * Try to remove the "submodule.<name>" section from .gitmodules where the given
>> + * path is configured. Return 0 only if a .gitmodules file was found, a section
>> + * with the correct path=<path> setting was found and we could remove it.
>> + */
>> +int remove_path_from_gitmodules(const char *path)
>> +{
>> +	struct strbuf sect = STRBUF_INIT;
>> +	struct string_list_item *path_option;
>> +
>> +	if (!file_exists(".gitmodules")) /* Do nothing without .gitmodules */
>> +		return -1;
>> +
>> +	if (gitmodules_is_unmerged)
>> +		die(_("Cannot change unmerged .gitmodules, resolve merge conflicts first"));
>> +
>> +	path_option = unsorted_string_list_lookup(&config_name_for_path, path);
>> +	if (!path_option) {
>> +		warning(_("Could not find section in .gitmodules where path=%s"), path);
>> +		return -1;
>> +	}
>> +	strbuf_addstr(&sect, "submodule.");
>> +	strbuf_addstr(&sect, path_option->util);
>> +	if (git_config_rename_section_in_file(".gitmodules", sect.buf, NULL) < 0) {
>> +		/* Maybe the user already did that, don't error out here */
>> +		warning(_("Could not remove .gitmodules entry for %s"), path);
>> +		return -1;
>> +	}
>> +	strbuf_release(&sect);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
> 
> This question applies for this function and a few more functions in this
> patch that has the same characteristics.
> 
> If we're in a state when we need to return non-zero, we don't do any
> cleaning (that is strbuf_release()). Since this file is in the part
> called libgit AFAIK, shouldn't we always clean after us?