Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] add simple tests of consistency across rebase types
- From
Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
- Date
- Jun 4, 2013, 06:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <51AD860B.1070507@viscovery.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <CANiSa6hGLKATn3uUJKoi4917R4qoiyRHHJWo-p8vFrCZsg5joQ@mail.gmail.com>
Am 6/4/2013 7:14, schrieb Martin von Zweigbergk:
Show 12 quoted lines
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> +
>>> +# checks that the revisions in "$2" represent a linear range with the
>>> +# subjects in "$1"
>>> +test_linear_range () {
>>> + ! { git log --format=%p "$2" | sane_grep " " ;} &&
>>
>> An interesting way to spell:
>>
>> test $(git rev-list --merges "$2" | wc -l) = 0
>
> Heh, true. I'll change that.Then I think it would be even better written as
revlist_merges=$(git rev-list --merges "$2") && test -z "$revlist_merges"
so as not to ignore errors in the git invocation (and at least one less fork()).
-- Hannes