Re: [PATCH 6/6] compat/nedmalloc: Fix compiler warnings on linux
- From
Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
- Date
- Apr 29, 2013, 23:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <517EFBB5.9040502@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v7gjmqwxn.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 27 quoted lines
> Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> writes: > >> On linux, when the build variable USE_NED_ALLOCATOR is set, gcc >> issues the following warnings: >> >> In file included from compat/nedmalloc/nedmalloc.c:63: >> .../malloc.c.h: In function 'mmap_resize': >> .../malloc.c.h:3762: warning: implicit declaration of function 'mremap' >> .../malloc.c.h: In function 'sys_trim': >> .../malloc.c.h:4195: warning: comparison between pointer and integer >> >> The warnings are caused by the <sys/mman.h> header not enabling the >> (conditional) declaration of the mremap() function. The declaration >> can be enabled by defining the _GNU_SOURCE symbol prior to including >> certain system header files. In particular, it may not be sufficient >> to simply define _GNU_SOURCE just prior to including the <sys/mman.h> >> header. (e.g. defining the symbol after including <sys/types.h> will >> be completely ineffective.) >> >> In order to suppress the warnings, we define the _GNU_SOURCE symbol >> at the start of the malloc.c.h header file. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> >> --- > > Hmmmm, is this even worth worrying about? I somehow thought this > was only meant to replace malloc on non GNU systems...
Maybe not. I certainly won't be using it on Linux. But I wanted to test the previous patch on Linux and it didn't compile cleanly, so ... (It passed all tests BTW).
ATB, Ramsay Jones