Re: [PATCH 1/4] strbuf_split_buf(): use ALLOC_GROW()
- From
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
- Date
- Nov 6, 2012, 07:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <5098C21F.6030803@alum.mit.edu>
- In-Reply-To
- <20121104114101.GA336@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On 11/04/2012 12:41 PM, Jeff King wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 07:46:51AM +0100, Michael Haggerty wrote: > >> Use ALLOC_GROW() rather than inline code to manage memory in >> strbuf_split_buf(). Rename "pos" to "nr" because it better describes >> the use of the variable and it better conforms to the "ALLOC_GROW" >> idiom. > > I suspect this was not used originally because ALLOC_GROW relies on > alloc_nr, which does fast growth early on. At (x+16)*3/2, we end up with > 24 slots for the first allocation. We are typically splitting 1 or 2 > values. > > It probably doesn't make a big difference in practice, though, as we're > talking about wasting less than 200 bytes on a 64-bit platform, and we > do not tend to keep large numbers of split lists around.
I did a little bit of archeology, and found out that
* ALLOC_GROW() did indeed exist when this code was developed, so it *could have* been used.
* OTOH, I didn't find any indication on the mailing list that the choice not to use ALLOC_GROW() was a conscious decision.
So history doesn't give us much guidance.
If the size of the initial allocation is a concern, then I would suggest adding a macro like ALLOC_SET_SIZE(ary,nr,alloc) that could be called to initialize the size to some number less than 24. Such a macro might be useful elsewhere, too. It wouldn't, of course, slow the growth rate *after* the first allocation.
FWIW, the "max" parameter of strbuf_split*() is only used in one place, though strbuf_split*() is used in some other places where not too many substrings would be expected.
I am working on some patch series that will eliminate even more uses of strbuf_split*(), so I won't work more on optimizing its resource usage unless somebody gives me a stronger nudge.
Michael
-- Michael Haggerty mhagger@alum.mit.edu http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/